🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action proposed by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad protest both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a national appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could possibly return the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in additional EU countries